cleIMC home

Cleveland Indy Media Center

cleveland indymedia
About Us Contact Us Subscribe Calendar Radio Show Publish
white themeblack themered themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themetheme help


Sep 20 Real Time Presentation Service from Money Maker Ma

Sep 25 Columbus Socialism Forum -- Why You Should Vote So

Add an Event





printable version - email this article

Short Summary and Op-Ed
by tyler Sunday February 01, 2004 at 01:00 AM
tnorman@equalvision.net

Section 7 of Perspectives on Global Warming: A Primer

Short Summary and Op-Ed


Since this is intended to be very brief, I will first state that it is my recommendation that the other sections be read also, if possible. In this section, I will simply make a very short summary of what is contained in the other articles, followed by a succinct opinion piece.

Global warming is loudly disputed within the scientific community. Many claim it poses a grave threat to life on earth, while others dismiss it as simply bad science. To be fair, both sides can be justly accused of poor scientific backing for their claims. The science of climate is a particularly difficult object of study, and the degree of accuracy expected from other scientific fields would never be possible. Also, both sides are quite obviously swayed by non-scientific interests, environmentalist on the one hand, and capitalist on the other. The debate still continues, both sides working feverishly to convince governments and the masses to follow their advice. If global warming theories do turn out to be correct, the future looks grim, with global environmental catastrophe potentially within our lifetime. However, it is possible to halt current trends, by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

I absolutely stand with those who are deeply concerned about global warming. Though it is true that those scientists also engage in propagandistic methods to convince people of their cause, the global warming deniers are blatantly falsifying their "evidences," and for the most part, not even supplying evidence at all, but merely pointing out that the concerned scientists are not 100% certain. Their "proofs" that global warming is not a threat have included a falsified essay made to look as if it had come from a respected scientific journal and numerous studies funded by fossil fuel corporations, which are hardly reliable as being free of bias and in the interest of the the environment and the people. And the fact that these deniers always point to the inaccuracy of the global warming theories as obvious proof of the fact that they are absolutely wrong is illogical, even ridiculous. Even if the theories are uncertain, even a small chance of disaster on the scale they predict ought to be enough to make everyone seriously think about lifestyles and industries now, and how to change them as soon as possible. To be sure, if it were not for the fact that those who create the most emissions are also among the most powerful, change for the better would actually be fairly painless. Solar and wind energy may be slightly more expensive, non-fossil fuel cars may not accelerate as quickly, and restrictions on deforestation might cause a rise in the cost of tropical fruit, but it is a small price to pay in exchange for knowing that our children will not live in a time of drought, wildfire, coastal flooding, famine, disease, and mass extinction even greater than that of 65 million years ago. Global warming ought to be a chief concern amongst the human race in general.



Other Articles about Global Warming:

add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 2 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
How About andy Sunday February 01, 2004 at 12:51 PM
Gore on Global Warming mking Sunday February 01, 2004 at 11:51 AM
IMC Network: www.indymedia.org Projects print radio satellite tv video Africa ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq nigeria south africa Canada hamilton maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg East Asia burma jakarta japan manila qc Europe alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol bulgaria croatia cyprus estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege lille madrid malta marseille nantes netherlands nice norway oost-vlaanderen paris/île-de-france poland portugal romania russia scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia west vlaanderen Latin America argentina bolivia brasil chiapas chile chile sur colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso Oceania adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne oceania perth qc sydney South Asia india mumbai United States arizona arkansas atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado danbury, ct dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk idaho ithaca kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma omaha philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca seattle tallahassee-red hills tampa bay tennessee united states urbana-champaign utah vermont virginia beach western mass worcester West Asia armenia beirut israel palestine ukraine Topics biotech Process discussion fbi/legal updates indymedia faq mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer

© 2000-2006 Cleveland Indy Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Cleveland Indy Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy