cleIMC home

Cleveland Indy Media Center

cleveland indymedia
About Us Contact Us Subscribe Calendar Radio Show Publish
white themeblack themered themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themetheme help

Sep 20 Real Time Presentation Service from Money Maker Ma

Sep 25 Columbus Socialism Forum -- Why You Should Vote So

Add an Event

printable version - email this article

Clean Ohio Fund to get only half of proposed budget
by elle / PD Saturday, Dec. 04, 2004 at 2:15 PM


Columbus - The Clean Ohio Fund created by voters in 2000 is expected to get only half the money it had coming in the soon-to-be-unveiled capital budget proposal.

The cash-strapped Taft administration is prepared to ask for $100 million for the fund, said spokesman Orest Holubec.

That is half of what proponents of the program expected to see in each two-year budget cycle.

Environmentalists who joined Gov. Bob Taft when he championed the Clean Ohio campaign in 2000 say the Republican governor and lawmakers are failing citizens if they stop short of paying for what was approved.

"The legislature, in our minds, needs to make good on the promise given to Ohio voters to create the Clean Ohio Fund," said Ohio Environmental Council spokesman Jack Shaner.

The constitutional amendment voters approved put no time frame on the spending, but both the political campaign and the enabling legislation that took effect in July 2001 laid out a four-year blueprint for the $400 million package of programs.

Half the money is earmarked for urban brownfields cleanup, and the other half goes to "green" programs such as farmland and parks preservation.

Taft still sees the Clean Ohio Fund as a priority, Holubec said, but resources are scarce.

"The governor will fight for $100 million in Clean Ohio money, which is a significant amount given this tight budget," he said.

Holubec said Taft has not ruled out seeking further funding for the program next year in a different bill.

It is traditional, however, to include state debt issues in the bricks-and-mortar capital budget.

Rep. Chuck Blasdel, who sponsored the bill laying out the Clean Ohio spending plan, said he hopes the Taft administration is simply spreading the financial burden over a longer period, not cutting the program.

"I'd like to see the full $200 million without a doubt, but I think there are ways that in a tight budget year you could slow down the funding and still have an effective program," said Blasdel, an East Liverpool Republican. "Now, if their intent is something other than that, then I have a real problem with it."

Chris Knopf, state director of the Trust for Public Land, said Clean Ohio grants leverage more federal and state money, so cuts have a deep impact.

His group has completed three projects with help from Clean Ohio grants, including the 1,200-acre East Sandusky Bay Nature Preserve near Cedar Point.

"From a strictly political standpoint: This is the governor's last term, and he really has the chance to leave a lasting legacy," Knopf said. "That would be best achieved during his administration by fully funding the program."

The state fully funded the program in each of the first two years, according to the agencies who administer the grants.

To reach this Plain Dealer reporter:
Wednesday, December 01, 2004
Julie Carr Smyth
Plain Dealer Bureau, 1-800-228-8272

add your comments

IMC Network: Projects print radio satellite tv video Africa ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq nigeria south africa Canada hamilton maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg East Asia burma jakarta japan manila qc Europe alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol bulgaria croatia cyprus estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege lille madrid malta marseille nantes netherlands nice norway oost-vlaanderen paris/île-de-france poland portugal romania russia scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia west vlaanderen Latin America argentina bolivia brasil chiapas chile chile sur colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso Oceania adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne oceania perth qc sydney South Asia india mumbai United States arizona arkansas atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado danbury, ct dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk idaho ithaca kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma omaha philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca seattle tallahassee-red hills tampa bay tennessee united states urbana-champaign utah vermont virginia beach western mass worcester West Asia armenia beirut israel palestine ukraine Topics biotech Process discussion fbi/legal updates indymedia faq mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer

© 2000-2006 Cleveland Indy Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Cleveland Indy Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy