Senate Bill 24 Threatens Speech at Ohio Universities
by jesse, cle-imc newswire
Wednesday, Feb. 23, 2005 at 4:00 AM
Senate Bill 24 Threatens Free Speech at Colleges Throughout Ohio
Proposed Ohio Senate Bill 24 threatens to prohibit professors of Ohio colleges from discussing certain "controversial" issues in class.
Introduced by Ohio Senator Larry Mumper, the bill also would also prevent faculty or administrative organizations from taking
a position on any issue from which there is "substantial disagreement". While Senator Mumper claims the proposed law, which he has
ironically dubbed the "Academic Bill of Rights", is intended to diversify debate in classrooms, the vague language of the bill does
not specify what is considered "controversial" or "substantial disagreement". Although claiming the bill is politically neutral,
many critics believe the underlying intent is to target professors who discuss liberal or radical beliefs, citing Senator Mumper's
statements to the Columbus Dispatch (1/27/05) that too many professors are "anti-american", claiming "80 percent of them are Democrats,
liberals, socialists or card-carrying communists."
Inspired by a meeting between Mumper and conservative writer David Horowitz, the bill also requires professors who discuss their
views to also include "views other than their own", but does not specify what
alternative views are considered legitimate. Faculty and students are concerned the bill will be enforced in a manner requiring
teachers to discuss right-wing views, not simply alternative ones.
Faculty and administrative organizations would no longer be free to take positions on any issue for which there exists "substantial
disagreement". Requiring "neutrality", it may be used to prevent faculty and administrative organizations from passing resolutions
concerning any government policy, including the war in Iraq, health care, social security, or school funding.
The vague language of the bill promises long, painstaking courtroom battles in Ohio's already clogged judicial system since courts
will have to define its less than concrete terms. Even if professors return victorious, the financial and professional damage may be irreversable.
As it is currently written, the bill would apply to both private and public schools, which has received criticism from many of its otherwise conservative supporters since it would also require religiously-affiliated schools to meet the "alternative views" standard. It seems forced diversity isn't so popular when the school is already right-wing.
Several Ohio universities have already passed resolutions against Senate Bill 24. Youngstown State's faculty senate drew up a
resolution, saying it "would impose serious and unnecessary restrictions on the methods of teaching, research and grading used
by college and university faculty." The University of Toledo student senate also passed a resolution on February 15, by a 30-1
margin, deeming Senate Bill 24 "a bill of stautory requirements, with no rational bearing, which will have an adverse impact on ... the colleges and
universities in the state of Ohio." Samuel Nelson, assistant professor of political science, spoke against S.B. 24 at the senate
meeting. "If I have to think about what the state legislature thinks of my syllabus ... I would self censor," he said, adding
that such a bill would have a "chilling effect" on what professors could do in classes.
The Ohio University Faculty Senate resolution
against Mumper's bill passed unanimously, while other resolutions have been
forged by Ohio college governments, including the Graduate Student Senate at Bowling Green, University of Akron
Faculty Senate, Provost of Ohio State University, and Faculty Senate at Cleveland State University.
[Ohio ACLU Resources | Ohio American Association of University Professors Responses: 1 2]
LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 1 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.