cleIMC home

Cleveland Indy Media Center

cleveland indymedia
About Us Contact Us Subscribe Calendar Radio Show Publish
white themeblack themered themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themetheme help


Aug 25 The RUDE MECHANICAL ORCHESTRA

Sep 4 Alixa & Naima Bring Hurricane Season to Cleveland

Add an Event





printable version - email this article

Considering Use of 9-11 Secret Weaponry (with video)
by Anonymous Saturday, Nov. 26, 2005 at 1:54 AM

Why have all the hypothetical speculations about the possible nature of the incredible obvious burst of light at the point of impact seen in the only known video of the 1st WTC strike failed to include this scene from the ~ 20 year old movie "Real Genius"? As we finally begin to recognize that "evil suicidal Muslim hijackers" can not honestly be blamed for 9/11, is it really that far-fetched to accept the probability that secret weapon systems were used to deceive us all on 9-11? { QuickTime video clip runs 2:22 }

QuickTime movie at 5.8 mebibytes

Some of the speculations regarding what is seen upon inspection of the 9-11 videos is truly bizarre. Firing any kind of physical missile at such close range would be completely counter-productive, and thus idiotic. Undoubtedly, some of the 9-11 "missile" proponents are disinformation agents.

And even if there were no disinformation agents, the bottom line remains that the flash frame in the Naudet video of the first WTC impact has never been intelligently investigated nor adequately explained. (see this page which has a recording of what was evidently the very first public airing of the video) For the most part, this visual evidence has only been ignored, suppressed, and dismissed without any sane explanation.

In that fashion, some groups have acted as gatekeepers of the mainstream of all acceptable 9-11 thought, keeping notions of high-tech possibilities from ever entering most people's heads. And as long as the few 911 truth advocates who appear on television never question certain unknown aspects of 9-11, those 9-11 questions and secrets can be safely kept hidden from public consciousness.

Back in the 1980s, President Reagan (or, to some, Raygun), became a big proponent of the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), better known as "Star Wars". And while part of that huge defense budget did go towards the old-fashioned concept of hitting a bullet with a bullet (or a missile with a missile), that was largely PR and budgetary cover for the cutting-edge technologies being secretly developed, including what are known as directed-energy weapons (ultra-high-energy lasers, and beyond).

This open secret technology appeared in a 1980s comedy movie, Real Genius. (see attached video clip) Of course, Hollywood movies are not the best examples of reality, but Hollywood's ability to make a point, however inaccurate and hyped, is not to be overlooked when it comes to helping people to imagine the most likely true nature of that flash frame which was so obvious in the Naudet video, as well as the similar, but muted, spot of light evident on the wall in the 2nd WTC impact videos (the only ones we were all expected and intended to be able to see and review).

The most likely purpose for an approaching aircraft to fire a directed-energy weapon at the wall immediately prior to impact was probably to facilitate the illusion that a large fragile aluminum bird could have flown intact through an undamaged structural steel wall, as appeared to have happened once or twice in NYC on 9-11.

That incredibly brief bright burst of light, before anything had happened to the wall, was not the result of any kind of physical missile or chemical reaction, any more than it could have been the result of hijackers, with or without boxcutters, having manually steered an ordinary commercial passenger airliner into an ordinary WTC tower.

That flash is well-documented. It appeared in the first airings of the Naudet video, after midnight. (That was at least our third indication that 9-11 was some kind of deadly, high-tech, "magic" show.) The same flash is there on the official Naudet video DVD release. The facts that it does not occupy a large portion of the screen and that some people have produced videos which lack the amazing flash does not make the flash's occurrence in any way questionable, any more than does the fact that so many people have just ignored it or remain unaware of it.

The flash seen in the Naudet video resembles very well focused output from a camera's flash gun. Except quicker and super-powerful, beyond what the world had ever witnessed. So that's probably not a bad way to think of it, given that it's been more than four years since 9-11, and we still have no explanation for it from the government, the media, nor the corrupt leaders of the 9-11 Truth Movement (who, rather than demanding an explanation for it, have preferred that it not be mentioned at all, same as the government and the media!).

add your comments


From the Naudet DVD
by Anonymous Saturday, Nov. 26, 2005 at 1:54 AM

From the Naudet DVD...
wtc1flash_dvd.jpg, image/jpeg, 206x217

Ignoring this remarkable flash is like asking Dorothy to pay no attention to that man behind the curtain in The Wizard Of Oz!

add your comments


IMC Network: www.indymedia.org Projects print radio satellite tv video Africa ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq nigeria south africa Canada hamilton maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg East Asia burma jakarta japan manila qc Europe alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol bulgaria croatia cyprus estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege lille madrid malta marseille nantes netherlands nice norway oost-vlaanderen paris/île-de-france poland portugal romania russia scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia west vlaanderen Latin America argentina bolivia brasil chiapas chile chile sur colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso Oceania adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne oceania perth qc sydney South Asia india mumbai United States arizona arkansas atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado danbury, ct dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk idaho ithaca kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma omaha philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca seattle tallahassee-red hills tampa bay tennessee united states urbana-champaign utah vermont virginia beach western mass worcester West Asia armenia beirut israel palestine ukraine Topics biotech Process discussion fbi/legal updates indymedia faq mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer

© 2000-2006 Cleveland Indy Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Cleveland Indy Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy