cleIMC home

Cleveland Indy Media Center

cleveland indymedia
About Us Contact Us Subscribe Calendar Radio Show Publish
white themeblack themered themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themetheme help

Sep 20 Real Time Presentation Service from Money Maker Ma

Sep 25 Columbus Socialism Forum -- Why You Should Vote So

Add an Event

printable version - email this article

problem with china: they NEED a war
by Bill Gallagher Hachita NM Saturday, Jul. 11, 2009 at 1:27 PM


the infanticide of females in china show the average chinese male for
what they really are, little monkey warlords, arrogant beastial
apelike thngies quacking threats and promises at each other as if it
meant something

and they want to rule the world

one of the fastest growing businesses within china itself is male prostitution

there one sees the manifestation of the races natural fail-safe
mechanism against overpopulation, versus the clotheshanger, versus war

the lord lovers and their types always choose war, and the little tin
warlords of chiner, the clotheshanger

although the failsafe will always manifest, because God made it that way

are you getting any of this? are you competent? God knows the
baptists ain't, and a bunch of others like that, they are really just
want-to-be jews, kind of like little tin warlords


naw, we're not monkeys...this is the most embarassing place i have
ever been....this planet i makes my butt itch....b

One Child Policy
The Chinese government introduced the policy in 1979 to alleviate
social, economic, and environmental problems in China,[4] and
authorities claim that the policy has prevented more than 250 million
births from its implementation to 2000.[2] The policy is controversial
both within and outside China because of the manner in which the
policy has been implemented, and because of concerns about negative
economic and social consequences.

*************The policy has been implicated in an increase in forced
abortions and female infanticide, and has been suggested as a possible
cause behind ******China's significant gender imbalance.[5]*****

Nonetheless, a 2008 survey undertaken by the Pew Research Center
showed that over 75% of the Chinese population supports the policy.[6]

The policy is enforced at the provincial level through fines that are
imposed based on the income of the family and other factors.
Population and Family Planning Commissions (Chinese: ∆ƅ˙˝ؑ) exist at
every level of government to raise awareness about the issue and carry
out registration and inspection work. Despite this policy, there are
still many citizens that continue to have more than one child.[7]

China's National Population and Family Planning Commission has said
that the policy will remain in place for at least another decade.[8]

NBC: China begins to face sex-ratio imbalance - World news-
Sep 14, 2004 ... The age-old bias for boys in China, combined with the
draconian one-child policy, has produced what may be the largest
gender imbalance in ...

add your comments

IMC Network: Projects print radio satellite tv video Africa ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq nigeria south africa Canada hamilton maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg East Asia burma jakarta japan manila qc Europe alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol bulgaria croatia cyprus estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege lille madrid malta marseille nantes netherlands nice norway oost-vlaanderen paris/île-de-france poland portugal romania russia scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia west vlaanderen Latin America argentina bolivia brasil chiapas chile chile sur colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso Oceania adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne oceania perth qc sydney South Asia india mumbai United States arizona arkansas atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado danbury, ct dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk idaho ithaca kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma omaha philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca seattle tallahassee-red hills tampa bay tennessee united states urbana-champaign utah vermont virginia beach western mass worcester West Asia armenia beirut israel palestine ukraine Topics biotech Process discussion fbi/legal updates indymedia faq mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer

© 2000-2006 Cleveland Indy Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Cleveland Indy Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy