put PrionPartyy to death : Cleveland IMC (((i)))

PrionPartyy is documented as a sympathizer of Palestinian terrorism, so it should be put to death.

How about lethal injection, using a machine made by one of it's idols, a Holocaust denier that fraudulently claimed to be an engineer?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_A._Leuchter#cite_ref-12

I can verify that PrionPartyy gives lousy head, but it is one of the most breathtakingly stupid people I have ever encountered. I would be nowhere without such mental cripples giving me aid and succor.

It was posted by the Zionist propaganda mill at least two years ago. If you don't believe me, then you're too stupid to understand what I'm saying, so don't waste time trying.

Is nessie, Sheepdog, and PrionPartyy, et al, the best defenders of Palestine out there? I personally would hide my head in shame if I were Palestinian, seeing that such horribly stupid people were all that's taken up my cause.

http://utah.indymedia.org/news/2005/10/12184_comment.php#15298

"Did nessie post these words? YES or NO: "
by one more time Monday June 12, 2006 at 10:20 AM

No, nessie did not post that. It was probably Smashy, setting up fraudulent "evidence" for his spurious claim that "Die Like a Dog" was edited. virtually every day for years he and his crew have posted stuff that nessie didn't write, and signed his name to it. Sometimes it is anti-Semitic propaganda. Sometimes it is gibberish. Sometimes it is a near quote, that has had a few words changed to alter the meaning. On rare occassions, they post something nessie actually did write, but out f context. This is not such a case. This is yet another fabrication, one of countless such fabrications.

We can only wonder why anyone would go to such lengths to smear an IMCista. Three possibilities come to mind:

(1.) Perhaps this is one guy, SmashTheLeft, who has severe mental problems, not much of a life and access to a computer at work, or more likely, at his parents house.

(2.) Smearing any IMCista smears the whole network. There is a group of right wingers, "connected via email and personal web sites,: who are using every trick in their book, dirty and otherwise, to take over Indymedia, and when that failed, to discredit it.

They even confessed, or bragged, depending how you look at it:

http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2004/04/123358_comment.php

(3.) Perhaps it not the work of one mental defective with a compulsion to act out in public, but cold, calculating psy-war. The Zionist propaganda mill knows full well that their grip on the progressive left is slipping fast. They are scrambling desparately to control Indymedia because they realize that it is one of the few places where they can still talk to progressive leftists. Nessie is an outspoken anti-racist who has relentlessly campaigned for their compete and total ban an all racist propaganda on Indymedia, not just Zionist, but Nazi, Klan or whatever. This is a direct threat to the Zionist propaganda mill's ability to spew their racist filth in front of a progressive left audience. So they have taken it upon themselves to attack nessie everywhere, and in any way, that they can. They publish anti-Semitic propaganda cut and pasted from Nazi sites, and sign the name "nessie" to it. The repost stuff nessie actually wrote, but with a few words changed to alter it's meaning. They attempt to portray nessie as a racist, a snitch, a child molester, a drunk, a felon, etc., in transparent, and thus vain, attempt to discredit him, and with him, anti-Zionism.

For details, see:

http://www.sfimc.net/news/2002/12/1555696_comment.php#1692248

So maybe it not Smashy, or the FR/PW/KOBE cabal who is responsible for this, but the Zionist propaganda mill. That it is the work of the Zionist propaganda mill is the most likely explanation, because it is a fairly sophisticated maneuver. On the other hand, it is Smashy who obsesses on this alleged typo. To have planted bogus evidence this far in advance does appear to be a lot more sophisticated than Smashy usually appears capable, On the surface, Smashy appears to be fairly simple minded. But he may not be simple minded at all. It may be a ruse. Or, he may not even exist. He may be a sock puppet, a literary character created by a sophisticated psy-warrior.

Perhaps, we shouldn't worry too much about which of IMC's many enemies posted this disinformation and forged nessie's name to it. Whoever it was, (s)he was lying. Until there is a network wide, rigorously enforced, zero tolerance policy for disinformation and forgery, Indymedia can *never* be taken seriously as a source of news nd no IMCista can be taken seriously as an activist. Indymedia's enemies know this, They also know that nessie is a tireless campaigner for such a policy. That alone is enough to make him target for an attack. When a message is too true to attack, often it is the messenger who is attacked instead. That is what we are seeing here. It's an ad hominem, i.e., bunk logic. It's a trick. Don't fall for it.

Prionpartyy aka PPyy aka Sheepdog is raw sewage.

http://cleveland.indymedia.org/news/2009/06/45264_comment.php#46545

there best is the worst
by PPyy Sunday, Jul. 12, 2009 at 10:42 AM

I respect my Palestinian neighbor's basic human right not to be destroyed by murderous thieving Zionist crusaders.

I also respect my Palestinian neighbor's basic human right to defend themselves from the murderous thieving Zionist crusaders.

Defending one's self includes 2 options, fight or flight. If a tiny fraction of a percent of Palestinians (something like .0000032%) defend themselves (fight) in ways you don't like (what you and others call terrorism) , they are still defending themselves. I sure as hell don't consider it my place to be judgeing others for how they choose to defend themselves from murderous thieving Zionist crusaders. I will still respect my Palestinian neighbor's basic human right of self defense even if you judge (which makes you the wanna be god) the tiny fraction of a percent of Palestinians as defending themselves in ways you do not approve of.

Something is odd, feel like I'm God...

That is a line from a song by The Offspring on the CD SMASH called Bad Habit. It is a song about road rage.

http://la.indymedia.org/news/2009/07/228736_comment.php#228919

deal with the real
by PPyy Sunday, Jul. 12, 2009 at 5:07 PM

I am not going to be judgemental against people defending themselves and acting under the extream durres of foreign invadors destroying their lives and lifes. That brings up extenuating circomstance which is a part of a real court of law, often left out of the court of public opinion which can be manipulated by media, education, etc. Would a tiny fraction of Palestinians be blowing themselves up to kill murderous thieving Zionist crusaders if the murderous thieving Zionist crusaders were murderous thieves occupying Costa Rican lands? I couldn't see that happening. Clearly it is the Zionist crusaders chosen murderous theft of Palestinian lands that is the cause of the hostilities.

Zionist crusaders are more than just "Jooooooooooooooos", as you put it. Zionist crusaders are murderous thieves occupying the Palestinian's homeland. And that is an offensive act of war which Zionists have chosen to take against their chosen Palestinian victims. NAZIs didn't much like their cities being bombed either. And what does the world generaly think of that . Too fukin bad Geeeeeeeeeeeeeermans. Looks like starting a war wasn't such a hot shit idea after all.

It is easy to be judgemental of people who are being offensive in their actions. Justice demands it. As do many religions (Lev 5:1). But being judgemental of people acting under the extream durres of murderous thieves destroying their lives and lifes, not so easy. In fact, impossible for some of us.

But you go ahead and keep pushing the notion that people are judging the murderous thieving Zionist crusaders because the Zionist crusaders are "Jooooooooooooooos", as you put it. After all, since crap is all you got, crap is all we will ever see from you.

What a complete waste of skin.

http://cleveland.indymedia.org/news/2009/06/45264_comment.php#49651

duh, like we need u 2 tell us what I thinkl
by PPyy Monday, Jul. 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM

terrorism is loosly defined as violence aimed at obtaining political gains.

Violence used to defend one's self or to liberate one's homeland from murderous thieving invadors is not a political gain but survival.

What, you think that little boy and fat man didn't kill children on their way to school? How about the allied bombing of Dresden, which some people call a war crime. I too could contemplate wether or not the bombing of Dresden was a war crime that "murdered" German children and wether or not the bomber crews and bomber comand were "terrorist'. But to what purpose would I do so. World war 2 started when Germany invaded Poland, and NOT when England and France declaired war on germany for invading Poland. Offensive v defensive. maybe I am wrong about that. Maybe world war 2 really did start when England and France declaired war on germany for invading Poland. If you or anyone would like to argue that, please give me food for thought.

Zionist crusaders force their children to live in a war zone which the Zionists themselves created in their own chosen war of conquest. When the children of Zionist's fall victim to the hostilities that the Zionist's war of conquest created, then those chilren are victims of the Zionist's chosen war of conquest. Zionists sacrifice their own children for conquest and then try to scapegoat the Zionist's chosen victims as the cause of the hostilities that the Zionists chosen war of conquest created.

Kind of like when some native Americans scalped whole wagon trains of men women and children. the brutality of the scalpings wouldn't change the dynamics of that war of conquest either. offensive v defensive. deal with the real. Sure, a tiny fraction of a percent of native Americans scalping whole wagon trains of men women and children is a brutal act. But if those men women and children hadn't chosen to join in the murderous theft of natrive American lands, like Zionists CHOSE to join in the murderous theft of palestinian lands, then they wouldn't have placed themselves in the position to suffer the hostilities that their chosen invasion of another people's homeland created. Not that you would condesend to understad any of that.

http://cleveland.indymedia.org/news/2009/06/45264_comment.php#49651

duh, like we need u 2 tell us what I thinkl
by PPyy Monday, Jul. 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM

terrorism is loosly defined as violence aimed at obtaining political gains.

Violence used to defend one's self or to liberate one's homeland from murderous thieving invadors is not a political gain but survival.

What, you think that little boy and fat man didn't kill children on their way to school? How about the allied bombing of Dresden, which some people call a war crime. I too could contemplate wether or not the bombing of Dresden was a war crime that "murdered" German children and wether or not the bomber crews and bomber comand were "terrorist'. But to what purpose would I do so. World war 2 started when Germany invaded Poland, and NOT when England and France declaired war on germany for invading Poland. Offensive v defensive. maybe I am wrong about that. Maybe world war 2 really did start when England and France declaired war on germany for invading Poland. If you or anyone would like to argue that, please give me food for thought.

Zionist crusaders force their children to live in a war zone which the Zionists themselves created in their own chosen war of conquest. When the children of Zionist's fall victim to the hostilities that the Zionist's war of conquest created, then those chilren are victims of the Zionist's chosen war of conquest. Zionists sacrifice their own children for conquest and then try to scapegoat the Zionist's chosen victims as the cause of the hostilities that the Zionists chosen war of conquest created.

Kind of like when some native Americans scalped whole wagon trains of men women and children. the brutality of the scalpings wouldn't change the dynamics of that war of conquest either. offensive v defensive. deal with the real. Sure, a tiny fraction of a percent of native Americans scalping whole wagon trains of men women and children is a brutal act. But if those men women and children hadn't chosen to join in the murderous theft of natrive American lands, like Zionists CHOSE to join in the murderous theft of palestinian lands, then they wouldn't have placed themselves in the position to suffer the hostilities that their chosen invasion of another people's homeland created. Not that you would condesend to understad any of that.

Cleveland Indy Media Center